Supported browsers: Internet Explorer 6.0+, Firefox 3.0+, Safari 3.0+, Chrome 5.0+, iPhone4 (partial support and may have to reload the page). Some graphics may not work in Opera.
When you drop something, how does it fall? Initially it is not moving but it begins to move. Its speed increases as it falls: it accelerates downward. Let's get a feel for this gravitational acceleration by watching a demo of objects falling.
(If the drawing canvas does not appear, is really short, or is blank, reload the page. The drawing canvas can be resized as you please (except on multitouch devices) by dragging and releasing the magenta drag-handle at the lower right of the canvas; the demo will restart.)
Instructions:
Note that this demo did not indicate the weight (or mass) of the cannon balls. In the fourth century BC, Aristotle taught that an object falls in proportion to its weight: the heavier a rock, the sooner it will reach the ground. For many centuries, this was accepted as true. It seemed reasonable and logical. But in the 1600s, Galileo thought about this, conducted experiments, and concluded that differing weight does not affect how objects fall when we can ignore the effect of air resisting the motion. Galileo said that a musket ball and a much heavier cannon ball dropped from the same height would hit the ground at almost exactly the same time.
Let's consider a "thought experiment". Let's start by assuming that a heavier ball falls faster than a lighter ball and see where that assumption leads us. Let's attach the two balls together with a strong but thin and light wire, then we drop the two balls connected by the wire. How fast will they fall? If the heavier ball falls faster than the lighter ball, then the string will let the heavier ball pull the lighter ball to go faster than if they were disconnected, right? Or will the lighter ball slow the heavier ball down? But wait, attaching the two balls together makes the pair heavier than each individually. Will the pair fall faster than the heavy ball did when disconnected? This is pretty confusing! What if our assumption was wrong? If the heavier and lighter balls fall at the same rate, then they would continue to fall at that rate if they were connected by a strong, thin wire: no contradiction. That seems to make sense. Falling due to gravity is independent of the mass of the falling object when we can ignore the effect of air resisting the motion.
Of course, this demo was simplified, ignoring air resistance/viscosity. This demo also ignored that Jupiter and the Sun don't have a solid surface and ignored the sun's radiation and solar wind.
Let me know if the balls dropping in the demo hung, were jerky (except when your PC cpu is heavily loaded), or had incorrect motion.
I hope you found this interesting, useful, and/or fun. Is there a demo you would like me to add? Would you like to be notified when a new demo is available? Links for sharing, reporting a problem, or emailing me are available in the pull-down menu at the top of the page. Feel free to link to my pages, screencast them to YouTube, or reuse my source code with attribution (MIT-style license).
Friend Links
Recommended Links